90-day founding alpha now open

Review process-development runs faster, with better evidence.

BATCHXPLORER Live brings batch context, historian trends, alarms, workflow events, controlled reports, and AI-assisted Process Insight into one browser-based platform for process-development and pilot-plant teams.

Watch Demo →
Engineering run review Golden-batch readiness Controlled evidence Patent-pending workflow
Who this is for

Built for teams reviewing real development runs.

Best-fit alpha sites have repeated runs, accessible process data, a named process owner, and a real pain around run review, standardization, or scale-up readiness.

Good fit

  • Process development, MSAT, tech transfer, pilot plant, or small-scale GMP teams.
  • Biologics, cell therapy, gene therapy, AAV, fermentation, or purification workflows.
  • Teams using historians, spreadsheets, alarms, batch notes, and manual reports.
  • Groups that want faster run review and better evidence before scale-up discussions.

Current pain

  • Batch context lives in one place while historian trends live somewhere else.
  • Alarms, equipment state, operator notes, and workflow events are disconnected.
  • Golden-batch discussions are spreadsheet-heavy and hard to defend later.
  • Controlled engineering summaries take too long to assemble after the run.

Not a fit yet

  • Teams requiring a full enterprise MES replacement during alpha.
  • Groups expecting automated QA batch release or product disposition.
  • Teams expecting a heavily customized application to fit client-specific needs.
  • Sites with no clear path to process data, historian access, or edge connectivity.
Platform focus

Everything your team needs to review a run in one place.

The product is broader than a dashboard, but the first sales motion is simple: reduce the friction between run completion and engineering understanding.

01

What ran?

Batch, suite, equipment, recipe, MES/SFC, or free-run context captured with timestamps and source context.

02

What happened?

Historian trends, CPP behavior, alarms, equipment status, and operator acknowledgements reviewed together.

03

What changed?

Audit trail, configuration baseline, workflow events, report lifecycle, and controlled changes stay traceable.

04

What should we review?

Process Insight summarizes CPP behavior, screens golden-batch readiness, and proposes engineering questions.

05

What evidence do we keep?

Controlled engineering reports preserve run summaries, limitations, review context, and next-step recommendations.

MES/SFC recipe workflow screen
MES/SFC and free-run contextStructured execution where needed, flexible experimentation where development still needs room to move.
Historian trend screen with process time-series data
Historian reviewProcess trends reviewed in the same context as batch and equipment events.
Controlled report preview
Controlled reportsDraft engineering summaries designed for process-owner review and traceable follow-up.
AI-assisted Process Insight

Turn batch data into engineering hypotheses your team can review.

Process Insight uses a bounded, read-only agent workflow to summarize CPP behavior, compare usable runs, screen golden-batch readiness, and generate draft engineering reports.

Important boundary: patent-pending Process Insight workflows are designed for engineering review — not GMP release, product disposition, QA batch release, or automated process approval.
Ask About Process Insight
Process Insight Report
Engineering Draft Directional baseline only Outcome / CQA linkage pending
Target samples618k+
Usable runs10
CPP tags6
Variation driverAIR_OVLAY2.21
Variation driverpO22.18
Variation driverCO2_OVLAY1.68

Bounded agent workflow

Sends selected run context and configuration metadata only, then uses approved read-only time-series access.

Golden-batch readiness

Classifies results as supported, directional, not a candidate, or inconclusive instead of overclaiming the data.

Controlled engineering draft

Captures limitations, cohort context, evidence, recommended actions, and process-owner review context.

Process characterization roadmap

Built to expand toward phase overlays, alarms/events, control charts, CQA linkage, and outcome correlations.

90-day alpha program

Join the alpha if you have real run-review pain.

We are not looking for casual tire-kickers. We are looking for process-development, pilot-plant, MSAT, and small-scale GMP teams willing to test the platform against a real workflow.

What alpha teams get

  • One qualified process area or suite.
  • Live batch and suite visibility.
  • Historian trend review and run context.
  • Alarm, equipment, and workflow context where available.
  • Controlled engineering report generation.
  • AI-assisted Process Insight preview.
  • Biweekly feedback sessions.
  • Commercial fit review before day 90.

What we need from you

  • A named process-development, MSAT, pilot-plant, or automation sponsor.
  • At least one real run-review use case.
  • Access to relevant process tags, historian data, or an edge connectivity path.
  • Willingness to review reports and give structured feedback.
  • Interest in paid conversion if the alpha proves useful.
Days 0–15

Setup and baseline

Define the use case, connect the first process area, and document the current run-review workflow.

Days 16–45

First useful run review

Capture or import a run, review trends and context, and generate a controlled engineering summary.

Days 46–75

Insight and repeatability

Use Process Insight to screen CPP behavior, similar runs, limitations, and next-run questions.

Days 76–90

Conversion decision

Review outcomes, fit, and whether the team should convert to Starter, Pro, Scale/GMP Ops, or no-fit.

What we measure during alpha

Time to assemble a run summary Systems checked manually Reports generated Engineering hypotheses identified User feedback and paid-fit signal
Watch the platform overview

See the first demo in action.

This short overview shows browser-based suite visibility, controlled records, edge-to-cloud data flow, and AI-assisted Process Insight for process-development and pilot-plant teams.

01Live run context

Review batch cards, suites, alarms, and equipment context without a desktop rollout.

02Controlled evidence

Connect historian review, audit trails, electronic signatures, and controlled engineering reports.

03Process Insight

Turn batch data into engineering hypotheses for process-owner review.

Alpha-first pricing

Start free for 90 days, then convert based on actual usage.

Founding alpha sites get broad module access so we can prove the workflow. After alpha, package gates are based on the scope your team actually uses: visibility, workflows, GMP evidence, multi-site governance, and partner-supported deployment.

Founding Alpha

Free software access for 90 days

For qualified process-development, MSAT, pilot-plant, and small-scale GMP teams willing to test against a real run-review workflow.

Starter

Process Development Starter

$1,500/mo+

For one suite, pilot room, or focused development group that needs live process context and controlled review.

  • Up to 10 named users
  • 1 edge gateway connection
  • 20,000 configured process tags per gateway
  • Dashboard, free-run capture, charts, equipment registry, audit trail
  • Basic controlled reports and historian review
Scale-Up / GMP Ops

Scale-Up / GMP Ops

$7,500/mo target

For regulated development, small-scale GMP, and scale-up teams that need stronger evidence governance.

  • Up to 50 named users
  • Multi-room / small-scale production support
  • GMP package drafts and controlled evidence reports
  • Backup/restore evidence and system log review
  • Full Process Insight with CQA linkage roadmap

Enterprise / Network

Custom quote for multi-site, private cloud/VPC, custom connectors, enterprise governance, and partner-led deployment packages.

Hardware and services boundary

Edge Gateway Kit: $1,195 one-time, including provisioning and remote commissioning. On-site validation, installation, historian/edge integration, and CSV support are quoted separately by qualified channel partners under their own statements of work.

Apply for the 90-day alpha program

Help shape a better way to review development runs.

We are looking for process-development, pilot-plant, MSAT, and small-scale GMP teams with real run-review pain.